This should actually not an issue with it structure; Sir John de- Keith d

This should actually not an issue with it structure; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife off Malise

Concerning the Comyn daughter who was simply partner of Malise out of Strathearn, I got theorized inside the 2005 one to she was in fact Margaret, defined as partner out-of Sir John de- Keith (look for copy out of article below) who had been 2ndly age are provided in that article: the fresh new wife Emma I suggest are of some other household members, and never mother of the 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl from Buchan_ , states simply, ‘Malise, Earl out of Strathearn, had a partner Emma, inside 1261-1267, whoever surname is actually unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. away from Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a bit just before 1270, to ensure that his widow (Margaret) might have been “available” a bit shortly after Emma.

This was naturally a speculation; it can have the advantageous asset of dealing with a known matchmaking between Muriel Keith and you will Reginald le Cheyne. Anymore relevant records carry out definitely become invited.

Brand new account for the Scots Peerage regarding family of Keith states of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he try considered has actually partnered Comyn, earl off Buchan . It identity, of your unsure (“believed to was in fact”) variety, can now feel fixed according to the following the dispensation, old in the Fondi to your fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Into the bishop off Moray. Faculty to help you dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, out of Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, in the obstacle to wedding as a result of the third and next amounts of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, tomorrow 2nd wife off Robert Stewart, very first Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), is contracted in order to marry Reginald ce Cheyne, child out of Sir Reginald ce Cheyne from the his partner (given that her basic partner), Helen away from Strathearn. When you’re there are famous openings in the origins regarding Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne would express an ancestry in the Comyns. not, this might be also faraway to need a good dispensation if the Muriel is actually an excellent-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl out of Buchan (d. 1233), which may end up being the circumstances if the ‘s the reason child.

2. Reginald ce Cheyne are a-grandson from Marjory Comyn, child away from Alexander Comyn, Earl out of Buchan (d. 1290), child of William Comyn in the list above. Their unique young buck are Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn from 1312 in order to their death when you look at the 1328 , and dad regarding Reginald.

ca. 1270), was Kako se upoznati Еѕena identical to Marjory Comyn, and you may married 2ndly to Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would indicate the fresh parentage a€?considered features been’ regarding Margaret, spouse off Sir John de Keith, try from that age group: she’d not have become brand new d Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan, but instead out of his young buck Alexander. There’s absolutely no proof that Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn were married much before 1275: once the Lindsay authored,

There can be you to definitely discernable basis about what the connection between Reginald le Cheyne and Muriel Keith would have lived: if Margaret Comyn, wife regarding Sir John de Keith (d

‘ New spouse for the earl, regarding the 1275, was named Marjory, as we see the attesting clause of Zero. cv., which is mentioned by Wyntoun, Book VIII. guy. vi., to possess become the second sis away from John Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, which discussed with respect to Earl Malise the wedding settlement significantly more than said [old in the London area, April twenty-six, 1293 to own his child Matilda and you can Robert de- Tony, young man out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E out-of Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith We (als I E from Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I We We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith E out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I I We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E away from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We le Cheyne We We I = 2) Sir David We V I I de- Graham Sir William de- I We__________ Keith We I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I I We III We We We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke regarding Albany)